Jannis Kreft: 衍生视听系统(说唱乐手Monarch与Thec)
柏林艺术大学的Jannis Kreft (aka “Dein Lieblinsgestalter”) 在视觉艺术系教授Joachim Sauter指导下提交了名为衍生视听系统(Generative Audiovisual Systems)的毕业设计。该系统借助vvvv软件激活互动装置,使说唱乐手Monarch和Thec进行现场行为表演。
电子乐惯常通过抽象画面展示,而嘻哈音乐的mv常见的形式都是booty video。Kreft打破常规,采用大量抽象画面表述嘻哈音乐,仅仅保留了美式经典嘻哈车Lowrider模型。(见左上角图示) 由于采用红外摄影机进行追踪,投射到乐手身上的影像可被装置的其他部分隔离。
更多详情请大家点击Kreft的网站,其中包括此次表演的详细进程,别忘了去找找场面热闹的现场照片。该网站还包括Kreft为媒体设计工作室Art+Com所做视听设计的相关资料。
via generatorx
责编:fis
April 12th, 2006 at 12:36 pm
Can someone tell me how do you think “Generative ” equals “衍生” in this case. I am confused.
Thx
April 12th, 2006 at 7:47 pm
Generative Art
April 14th, 2006 at 11:23 pm
Thx for the link, but Answers.com doesn’t really answer my question. “Generative” is a difficult term to deal with, what I was thinking if put “衍生” here, it might mean “derivative” or something, which is not a parallel consideration to “generative”. In my point of view, derivative sort of extends the original thing, like OO programming, the subClass inherits from baseClass, and contains all features parent has but slightly evolved. In the other hand, result of “generative ” possibly has no intuitive relation to its cause, which is the human-control side(can be other sources), in one’s position, the author try best to avoid central control but de-centralization instead, just ensure the final output automatic and unpredictable(not totally, but under certain condition). As consequence , “自动产生” makes a bit more sense even though it sounds too mechanical.
If anyone got some thoughts of this topic, please, share it.
April 17th, 2006 at 12:40 am
将generative译作“衍生”的确有不当之处,很多地方采用的是“演化”
generative art的本质实际上是一种evolution,所以演化艺术似乎更好些。
April 18th, 2006 at 9:47 pm
Nice one! Thx, sleepy!